+- Forums (http://lottopost.co.uk/forum)
+-- Forum: Lotteries (/forumdisplay.php?fid=29)
+--- Forum: UK Lotto 6-59 (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Repeat analysis (/showthread.php?tid=461)
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 10-02-2009 12:18 AM
A repeat skip of 2 has done very well recently, and a repeat skip of 3 has done very badly recently. If you think they might hit in the next draw then one or more of these numbers may be involved.
1436....... 3.... 5.... 17.... 32.... 40.... 43.... 29
1435....... 23.... 25.... 28.... 41.... 46.... 47.... 27
RE: Repeat analysis - Len - 10-02-2009 01:14 AM
Hi Frank
Nice one Mate!
You got three numbers and the bonus ball
23,32,46 BB17
Numbers drawn
14,21,23,32,36,46 BB17
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 10-05-2009 04:43 AM
(10-02-2009 01:14 AM)Len Wrote: Hi Frank
Nice one Mate!
You got three numbers and the bonus ball
23,32,46 BB17
Numbers drawn
14,21,23,32,36,46 BB17
Yes that was the best one I've done for ages, I used repeat skips of 390, 28, 1056, 246, 709, 1013, 3, 2, and 396 -- and six of the 9 had repeat hits this time. My elimination list of 18 numbers had only one number incorrect.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 04-18-2010 09:28 PM
It's been a long time since I posted in this thread, but I have persevered with this system and recorded over the weeks how well or how badly my lists did against each predicted result.
My pick ones and pick fours are derived from this analysis, and now and again it seems to get one or two right, such as in the last draw 1494, I got two right for the purposes of pick four.
I have a scoring system based on how probable a number is to repeat to the next draw but many numbers share the same score, so I have to put them into colour groups, same colour = same score. In the last draw for example 1494 ,The scores taken after draw 1493 were
Score >3............. 17,24 (purple)
Score =3...............3,10,29,36 (blue)
Score=2 ...............1,5,6,7,11,18,26,27,28,31,34,42,44,47,49 (yellow)
and there are more as you will see in the attached image (shows the last few weeks only) and white ones score zero and expected to be eliminated. The Actual result matches have red fonts for the main balls.
What I'm striving to do by tweaking a few things and adding some extras based on Lens Data sheet is get results which fall in the purple and blue zones, the leftmost groups.
[attachment=452]
I just got lucky in the last draw as 3,10,29,36 were drawn in 1494, and 31 and 44 were in the next block (yellow) I really need my scores to be wider ranging than 0 to 4 or 5 as they are currently coming out, so I can have more (and smaller) colour groups. Then the aim of getting more results in the (smaller) leftmost groups can be aimed for. As you can see, not all past attempts have been as good as the last draw. But I keep going on and tweaking. My prediction (for what its worth) is already in the chart and my pick four happen to be in the purple zone for this draw.
RE: Repeat analysis - Len - 04-18-2010 10:09 PM
Hi Frank
I'm pleased the Section_Data.htm is coming in handy Mate.
I use your Block Compartor.xls and Variable block comparter.xls
along with the reduced set28.xls
I did get four numbers using them
but one as you know, was the bonus ball,
it goes to show, were on the right track
it's only a matter of time before one of us
posts a winning set of numbers.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 04-18-2010 11:25 PM
Len, I've evolved my version of the variable block comparator to record the number of past blocks each number matched out of 7 (but is not yet drawn in this current block) and store for post result inquests. these were in the list.. 3,29,31,36,45 (block size =10, counting all 10) prior to 1494 where red was match 7, blue was match 6, green was match 5 (past blocks but not yet drawn in this block) but they were accompanied by lots of other numbers variously colour coded, so were not conspicuous.
RE: Repeat analysis - Len - 04-18-2010 11:52 PM
Hi Frank
What I'll do is keep adding more date to the Section_Date.htm
the more data we have the better.
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 10-03-2010 10:37 PM
Well for the first time in about a year pretty much all of the "lines predicted to contain a repeat number" ( 25 of them ) actually on draw 1542 did contain at least one repeated number.
![[Image: 213htgi.gif]](http://i51.tinypic.com/213htgi.gif)
For example I had a skip of 11 (meaning from draw 1531 5,10,12,17,28,30( 47) as it turned out 10 was correct.
I had a skip of 38, draw 1504 ...01 04 16 37 47 49 (27) and 16 was correct. The red ones in the table are correct main balls and the the maroon are bonuses.
After counting up the predicted possibles I ended up with
![[Image: 290x9pz.jpg]](http://i54.tinypic.com/290x9pz.jpg)
Which listed my best predictions left to right in priority order.
I had match 5 plus the bonus trapped in 26 numbers (left to right) which is far better than chance alone.
Unfortunately I didn't actually use the bottom 6 results (the ones in grey) as this varies by personal choice. If I had, the result would have been even better. Also number 26 wasn't in any of the lines I thought would repeat, placing it at the right hand end in the elimination list !
I probably won't get as close as this every week, but I thought i'd mention that even if my pick ones and fours don't often score, this sometimes does. In case you were wondering, my pick four doesn't come from this version of the list, I reduce the number of lines in the table taken into account until I get a clear winner (pick one) and 3 clear runners up (to make a pick four) and this changes the order of the top 4 so I got 24,34,35,37 as my top four with less lines actually counted in.
RE: Repeat analysis - ido - 10-19-2010 12:46 AM
(10-03-2010 10:37 PM)Frank Wrote: Well for the first time in about a year pretty much all of the "lines predicted to contain a repeat number" ( 25 of them ) actually on draw 1542 did contain at least one repeated number.Hi Frank,
you know ,this is second me so great result that one is
uncapable to comprend the whole importance after the first
glance .
I just wonder if you consider and would like to make you notice
the hidden aspect of such a number of past draws giving a contribution
to that draw 1542 by a pair.
When 4 draws ago I firstly read this your post ,this was my
very curiosity -what else will do that 7 past draws in the near future ..
or at least the rest 4 numbers of any sextup giving one pair to the draw
1442?Bellow the 7 rests of 4 main numbers (pool of 28 trebles)
24-27-44-49
4-34-35-37
8-13-28-36
21-41-42-43
8-14-42-48
11-14-21-42
15-18-42-48
1545_13.10_19,27,26,44,18,24_BB 8
........
note:in blu the pair 21,42 not only because it's present two times but it's as well a pair "Fibonaci" type(21x2=42,let say there is recently
something about that kind of pairs in the UK Lotto draw),may be
suspected it's appearance
.......
I thing that the pool of trebles will give more in the next (let say 8)
draws but I'm now more curious about :
Is it possible to skip by the repeat analyse the 15(or all the 21)
pairs of any last draw in opposite direction(from the present to the past)
for having a secondary sequence of past draws suspected to be entering
in a high frequence ?
Logicaly any amount of draws present in both lists,your usual and that based on a pairs analyse, should be strongly probable to muve together
in a near future moment
RE: Repeat analysis - Frank - 10-28-2010 12:04 AM
Quote:I thing that the pool of trebles will give more in the next (let say 8)
draws but I'm now more curious about :
Is it possible to skip by the repeat analyse the 15(or all the 21)
pairs of any last draw in opposite direction(from the present to the past)
for having a secondary sequence of past draws suspected to be entering
in a high frequence ?
Logicaly any amount of draws present in both lists,your usual and that based on a pairs analyse, should be strongly probable to muve together
in a near future moment
Quote:note:in blu the pair 21,42 not only because it's present two times but it's as well a pair "Fibonaci" type(21x2=42,let say there is recently
Sorry Ido, I didn't understand the question when I first read it 10 days ago, and having read it again I still dont understand it.
Anyway I thought Fibonacci was 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144 (the previous 2 added together, the previous 2 added together, the previous 2 added together........................................) not 2x another ????