Number elimination

[Frank]

(07-13-2009 04:20 AM)mario Wrote:  But what do you understand with non-adjacent skips? You forms its with summ of 2 or 3 adjacent skips? It seems very interesting!

Why 86 draws ago the skips don't appear enought in the last 12 draws?
Which is that skips?

Hi mario, A draw repeating from long ago (with any ofthe six main numbers) will have had those numbers also repeating from other draws with lesser skip values. For example number 28 repeated to draw 1414 from 86 draws before (non adjacent skip of 86) , but 28 will have appeared many times in between with adjacent skip values which will add up to 86.
In this particular example we are only looking at skips from 86 draws ago to ALL the recent draws to look for repeats from 86 draws ago. The image attached shows any repeated numbers from 86 draws before.. I'm looking for 2 things,
1. repeats to recent draws especially the last 2 draws
2. many repeats in general to the last 12 draws .

Thus establishing trend which may continue to the next draw in the future. The image shows that despite there being some repeats to the last 2 draws, there are few other repeats to other draws in the last 12, so this does not satisfy my criterion of a good skip value to use for predicting the NEXT draw.

Now take a look at skips from 282 draws ago (next image).
This satisfies BOTH crieria and gives me reason to suggest this is a trend which may continue to the next draw hence I use this skip value and note down the 6 actual balls in the result from 282 draws ago (draw 1133) which might repeat to draw 1415.
I also use other skip values equally as interesting to create a shortlist of probable repeats to the next draw, taking the associated results into my shorlist. I'm currently using the 6 best examples of good skip values (found by the above process) . I also to note the absences of any specific balls in this excercise. This is the elimination list I got above..