Number elimination

[Frank]

(08-03-2009 11:02 PM)Len Wrote:  

(07-31-2009 07:28 PM)Frank Wrote:  

(07-31-2009 06:42 AM)mario Wrote:  For draw 1420:

38, 27 is my number elimination, very, very bad;

and 40, 14, 21, 34, 16, 30 are bad;

is my strategy with follow up and bad numbers;

for 1420 there were a lot of eliminated numbers in my system so I had to split them into 2 lists:-

Strongly Eliminated... 9 18 20 21 27 28 32 36 49

and Eliminated...1 3 4 5 6 13 14 16 17 22 24 25 26 29 35 39 40 41 43 45

I'm hoping that the first list has no hits in 1420 and ideally none of the ones in the second list either.

There are some similarities with Marios list.

Hi Frank
You had 27,28,49 in your Strongly Eliminated list,
and
06,14,40 in your Eliminated list.
i.e.Numbers: 02,06,27,28,40,49 BB14
Were drawn in Draw: 1420

Thanks Len, I had noticed that. Having had an inquest into what happenned, I had based my lists on the assumption that 10 specific values of skip would continue their good run of repeats into draw 1420. What actually happenned was that seven of the 10 skips failed to repeat to 1420 whilst the other 3 did. I lost the compound 50/50 bets 7 to 3 .
This had the effect of switching the eliminated lists over to bankers lists and hence the result we got. Theres 2 ways to look at this system. You either want the majority of the 10 skips to continue as before so the elimination list is correct, or you want the majority of them to fail to repeat so that the list becomes a banker list . That way you could hedge your bets and bet on both lists (the bankers and the eliminated ) . The reality is that more often, half the skips continue their run and half dont, so you get a mixture of hits and misses in the two lists. However so far when the system has failed it has done so spectacularly so that the elimination lists became bankers, so is still a useful system albeit for the wrong reasons.