Request for you

[649lotto player]

(09-23-2009 12:05 AM)ido Wrote:  

(09-22-2009 08:33 PM)649lotto player Wrote:  since I locked in here I was not very sucessful with prediction or
deleting numbers for the next draw.

Hi 649lotto player,

I would permit myself to initiate my replay whith an advice:
Stop,please , trying to predict numbers for the next draw-
it's sucessful for lets say not more than 10% and begin to work on predicting for a number(a second of your bet banc or your caracter)
of several next draws
...........................
".......Because you prefer the distance of seven for your pairs,
I counted the availability of all possible 48 distances within
the 14.983.816 combinations and found that the most
available distance for pairs is one and not seven

Therefore I think you would have higher chances with
pairs with the distance one than with pairs with the
distance seven......"


You obviosly have a time a disposition for doing such a researches,
how exactly the availability of distance 1 can increase my
chances ?Do you have some pratical advice?

In this exact moment there is the "distance1" pair 34-35 in overdue from 17 draws.Second your list its availability must be not less
than 174 724 ,89 within 14.983.816 lines , but how it helpes me if I decide
to punt on it ,for how many selections do I have to be prepared financialy
to resist, how to know when to stop for limit losing money??????
............................
"........1-49 has the distance 48 (the highest possible distance,
least available)...."

In matter of this I'm convicted believer in the circonferential consecutivity so 49-1 is a consecutive pair ,all distances have 49 pairs possible,any color has 7 pairs possible for any of the distances possible and this is whay I use the word distance but not matematical difference.

I'm curios about the nature of your methods,how do you make
your choises - using as Mario the skip strategy?

Hi Ido,

my replies will be always late because I have to work
and log in only sometimes at lunch time.

Up to now I didn't anything with pairs and my recommendation
for using most available distances 1 is simple a statistic view.

As soon as I'll have the time I will change my program and will
count the 48 distances availability in the past UK drawings.

The availability should fit to the total availability.
That means that the distance 1 also should be most available.

Therefore a pair of numbers with the distance 1 should
appear sooner at the next drawings than a pair of numbers
with a larger distance.

Because of this I think the chance to predict a pair of numbers
with the distance 1 is given more often, but clearly depends
of the prediction method.

49-1 is a consecutive pair in your view, but if we sort the drawn
numbers, it will not appear as a distance 1.
For your view you have to research past drawn numbers
also in drawn order.

At the moment I play with the skip strategy where I omit
the last 3 times 7 drawn numbers, which are mostly 18 numbers.

Then I use an optimised open wheel with 31 numbers with some lines
(12 or 24 or 36 or 48 lines) with the guarantee 3 if 5
(because one of the omitted 18 numbers will be drawn again)
and transpose it to 49 numbers.

With this method I should get the highest return with 3
right numbers.

But I still have to work out which of the past 18 drawn numbers
could be repeatet again, so that I don't omit it..

649lotto player