Repeat analysis

[ido]

(11-08-2010 02:48 AM)Frank Wrote:  Just to show how repeat analysis can also get it wrong, this time it failed spectacularly.

....................

Out of the 18 rows of possible repeats only 7 were correct and worse still, the ones I might have used but didn't (in grey) contained lines that would have matched 3 - and skipping from 8 and 10 years ago.
The net result was that the whole result and the bonus ball were listed in my last 29 lowest scoring balls, appearing more at the eliminated end of my list rather than the bankers end. Ah well

Hi Frank,
isn't it possible to be a kind of "swich to.." allert?Maybe will start a grey period and as David wrote ones it's a time to play "the oposite of wath one
think may appear"?

This time everyone and everything failed spectacularly (we all included),symply appeared the second quin in the History of UK Lotto from the decade 30-39 but this time BB included.
And somehow maybe the decade gave some signs ,there was 3 trebles from the group in the last 5 last previous draws - in 5 draws 3 trebles
from all 135 since the Lotto start.

Now theoreticaly(one theory of the thousands) a pair at least from the quin should repeat quite immediately,more probable a treble having else number from the decade(not appeared in the quin)...and this means a pool of 50 trebles from the 30-39 group.

It's out of place,sorry, but it is possible for you to update your file
of the missing trebles ,maybe from that list one treble from the group
30-39 will have its first appearance just in the next few draws?